Message boards :
Number crunching :
extreme long wu's
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 21 Feb 15 Posts: 64 Credit: 65,733,511 RAC: 0 |
I see on some of my pc's extreme long wu's with estimated runtime of > 2 days. Faulty data or is it planned? |
Send message Joined: 6 Mar 15 Posts: 28 Credit: 16,721,329 RAC: 0 |
I just noticed that I've got one WU that's been running for 40 hours (with an estimated 3 hours left). |
Send message Joined: 28 Feb 15 Posts: 253 Credit: 200,562,581 RAC: 0 |
I terminated one after 43 hours on 25 December. I doubt that it is a proper work unit. |
Send message Joined: 6 Mar 15 Posts: 28 Credit: 16,721,329 RAC: 0 |
I terminated one after 43 hours on 25 December. I doubt that it is a proper work unit.I'm going to abort the long runner I have -- it's made no progress and the time remaining hasn't changed in over 3 hours. |
Send message Joined: 4 Feb 15 Posts: 846 Credit: 144,180,465 RAC: 0 |
Linux or Windows? Krzysztof 'krzyszp' Piszczek Member of Radioactive@Home team My Patreon profile Universe@Home on YT |
Send message Joined: 6 Mar 15 Posts: 28 Credit: 16,721,329 RAC: 0 |
Linux or Windows? For me, Linux (on this host). It doesn't show in the stderr output, but it had been running for about 43 hours when I aborted it. |
Send message Joined: 21 Feb 15 Posts: 64 Credit: 65,733,511 RAC: 0 |
Linux or Windows? Windows. |
Send message Joined: 1 Oct 16 Posts: 32 Credit: 268,033 RAC: 0 |
I also have a long runner, 23+ hours in, the remaining is over 18 days, increasing rapidly, suspended for now. |
Send message Joined: 28 Feb 15 Posts: 253 Credit: 200,562,581 RAC: 0 |
I terminated one after 43 hours on 25 December. I doubt that it is a proper work unit. That is on Ubuntu 16.10, running on an i7-4790. Nothing is overclocked, at the CPU runs at a reasonable temperature (65 C). |
Send message Joined: 2 Jun 16 Posts: 169 Credit: 317,253,046 RAC: 0 |
Is there a '10' in the task name near the end? They've been known to take several times as long as normal tasks. |
Send message Joined: 1 Oct 16 Posts: 32 Credit: 268,033 RAC: 0 |
No, it is, universe_bh2_160803_38_1_20000_1-999999_775000 Sorry, I had not seen the later post, my wu is the one I referred to in my earlier post. Windows 8.1, 4GHx i7 system, no overcvlock. It says it is 4.949% done, some loop after that point perhaps? It seems to have been completed by my wingman in just over two hours. |
Send message Joined: 6 Mar 15 Posts: 28 Credit: 16,721,329 RAC: 0 |
Is there a '10' in the task name near the end? They've been known to take several times as long as normal tasks. The one I aborted after about 43 hours was universe_bh2_160803_35_3_20000_1-999999_925000_1. |
Send message Joined: 28 Feb 15 Posts: 253 Credit: 200,562,581 RAC: 0 |
Is there a '10' in the task name near the end? They've been known to take several times as long as normal tasks. No, mine was BHspin v2 universe_bh2_160803_35_3_20000_1-999999_935000_0 |
Send message Joined: 1 Oct 16 Posts: 32 Credit: 268,033 RAC: 0 |
I released the wu, sometimes stopping and restarting gets things going, but all that happened was the % complete dropped to 4.940%, (checkpoint reload?), but nothing seemed to start, just increasing remaining time, at about 1 minute every 3 seconds. I've suspended it again, thoughts of things to try to help find this problem welcome. |
Send message Joined: 1 Oct 16 Posts: 32 Credit: 268,033 RAC: 0 |
I'm doing some work on another machine and had to power this one off to swap power supplies. The wu started again from 0.0%, ran quickly up to 4.940% then stuck again. |
Send message Joined: 6 Mar 15 Posts: 28 Credit: 16,721,329 RAC: 0 |
In case it helps with anything that can be identified, here's one I aborted after noticing it had been running for over two days on one of my Win10 hosts: universe_bh2_160803_39_3_20000_1-999999_850000_1 |
Send message Joined: 1 Oct 16 Posts: 32 Credit: 268,033 RAC: 0 |
Weird isn't it? A collection of similar problems from different CPU's running under different operating systems, yet others are completing the same work units without problems in reasonable times. All at this, and only this, project. Interesting. |
Send message Joined: 15 Sep 15 Posts: 2 Credit: 10,743,881 RAC: 0 |
A 35_1 and a 39_3 never seemed to finish for me. A restart brought down reported elapsed runtimes from about 20 hrs to 25 min and 9 min. I guess the wu:s got stuck at those elapsed times. all else works fine. happy new year! |
Send message Joined: 5 Jul 16 Posts: 31 Credit: 18,447,833 RAC: 0 |
I have also a few of them: http://universeathome.pl/universe/workunit.php?wuid=8263782 http://universeathome.pl/universe/workunit.php?wuid=8263885 http://universeathome.pl/universe/workunit.php?wuid=8282772 http://universeathome.pl/universe/workunit.php?wuid=8313020 http://universeathome.pl/universe/workunit.php?wuid=8282785 Ubuntu and Windows Systems I've canceled http://universeathome.pl/universe/workunit.php?wuid=8168255 http://universeathome.pl/universe/workunit.php?wuid=8282958 Ubuntu 16.04 This 2 will run till 9.1 when im back to work. Happy New Year Franz |
Send message Joined: 1 Oct 16 Posts: 32 Credit: 268,033 RAC: 0 |
I checked to see if it restarted again, but just the same, no suggestions for anything practical here. Aborted. |